Updated August 12, 2025
When it comes to medical devices, a cybersecurity vulnerability isn’t just a technical flaw — it’s a patient safety risk. ISO 14971, the internationally recognized standard for medical device risk management, offers a proven framework for identifying, evaluating, and controlling risks throughout a device’s lifecycle. Historically applied to mechanical and clinical hazards, ISO 14971 now plays a pivotal role in addressing cybersecurity threats that could disrupt care, compromise patient data, or cause direct harm.
In 2025, the FDA reinforced the need to merge cybersecurity into existing safety processes by updating its Cybersecurity in Medical Devices guidance. Manufacturers are expected to integrate security into their quality system, premarket submissions, and postmarket activities — and ISO 14971 is the ideal structure to make this happen.
Why Cybersecurity Belongs in ISO 14971 Risk Management
Modern medical devices are more connected than ever — integrating with hospital networks, cloud platforms, mobile apps, and even patient-owned devices. This connectivity introduces a wider attack surface for malicious actors. A single unmitigated vulnerability could:
- Interrupt life-sustaining therapies or diagnostics
- Expose protected health information (PHI)
- Be exploited to alter device performance in dangerous ways
The FDA views cybersecurity risks as safety and effectiveness risks under the FD&C Act. This means your device’s security measures must be evaluated alongside clinical safety considerations, not as an afterthought. ISO 14971 provides the structure to ensure that security hazards are identified, controlled, and monitored using the same rigor as other safety risks.
📌 Pro Tip from Blue Goat Cyber
Integrating cybersecurity into ISO 14971 early in development is not just about compliance — it’s a competitive advantage that can streamline FDA reviews and build customer trust.
Step-by-Step: Applying ISO 14971 to Cybersecurity
The ISO 14971 process can be seamlessly adapted for cybersecurity risk management:
1. Hazard Identification
Document potential cybersecurity hazards that could impact safety, such as unauthorized access, malware injection, data tampering, or denial-of-service attacks. This step often benefits from formal threat modeling techniques.
2. Risk Analysis
Assess the likelihood and severity of each hazard. For cybersecurity, consider both the technical exploitability and the potential patient harm. For example, a vulnerability in a device’s wireless update mechanism could allow malicious firmware to be installed, leading to therapy disruption.
3. Risk Evaluation
Determine which risks exceed your acceptable thresholds and require mitigation. In cybersecurity, this often means addressing even low-likelihood risks if the potential patient harm is severe.
4. Risk Control
Implement technical, administrative, and procedural controls. Examples include:
- Strong authentication
- End-to-end encryption
- Network segmentation
- Secure software update processes
5. Residual Risk Assessment
Evaluate what risks remain after controls are applied and determine if they are acceptable. Any residual cybersecurity risk should be clearly documented in your device’s labeling in accordance with FDA cybersecurity labeling requirements.
6. Postmarket Surveillance
Continuously monitor for new threats and vulnerabilities. This includes vulnerability scanning, SBOM updates, and participating in coordinated vulnerability disclosure (CVD) programs.
Example: Applying ISO 14971 to a Wireless Infusion Pump
A manufacturer developing a wireless infusion pump identified a potential hazard: unauthorized wireless commands.
- Risk Analysis: Exploitability was medium; potential harm was high (incorrect dosage delivery).
- Risk Evaluation: Risk was deemed unacceptable without controls.
- Risk Control: Implemented WPA3 encryption, mutual device authentication, and an intrusion detection alert.
- Residual Risk: Minimal, but documented in labeling with operational recommendations for network isolation.
- Postmarket Monitoring: Ongoing penetration testing and SBOM vulnerability monitoring.
This approach not only addressed FDA requirements but also demonstrated to hospital procurement teams that the device met stringent security standards.
Best Practices for Cybersecurity in ISO 14971
- Integrate with SPDF: Align risk management with a Secure Product Development Framework so security is embedded in design.
- Use Threat Modeling: Identify attacker goals and pathways early.
- Maintain a Robust SBOM: Track all third-party components and their vulnerabilities.
- Engage Cross-Functional Teams: Cybersecurity risk management isn’t just for engineers — quality, clinical, and IT teams must contribute.
Common Pitfalls to Avoid
- Treating cybersecurity separately from safety risk management
- Failing to reassess risks after software updates or environmental changes
- Not disclosing known vulnerabilities in labeling
- Over-relying on IT security tools without clinical safety context
Partner with Blue Goat Cyber for Risk Management Excellence
At Blue Goat Cyber, we help medical device manufacturers implement ISO 14971-compliant cybersecurity risk management that satisfies FDA, EU MDR, and other global requirements. From threat modeling to SBOM development and postmarket monitoring, our experts ensure your devices are secure, compliant, and ready for market.
Don’t wait until a vulnerability becomes a recall. Contact us today to strengthen your risk management process and protect your devices and reputation.
ISO 14971 FAQs
ISO 14971 is an international standard for the application of risk management to medical devices. It provides a structured framework for identifying, evaluating, controlling, and monitoring risks associated with both product safety and performance—including cybersecurity risks.
ISO 14971 helps manufacturers integrate cybersecurity risks into their overall risk management process. This includes assessing threats like unauthorized access, data breaches, or system manipulation, and applying controls to reduce those risks to acceptable levels.
While not legally required, ISO 14971 is widely recognized by the FDA and the EU MDR as a best-practice framework for risk management. Applying ISO 14971 can significantly strengthen your cybersecurity documentation in premarket submissions.
Safety risk is typically related to device malfunction or failure, while cybersecurity risk involves intentional threats like hacking or unauthorized access. However, both can impact patient safety, so ISO 14971 treats them within the same risk management structure.
Yes. ISO 14971 requires you to identify foreseeable hazards, including software-related threats. Vulnerabilities such as buffer overflows, hardcoded passwords, or weak authentication mechanisms must be evaluated for impact and likelihood.
The risk management file is a living document that includes all records of identified risks, analyses, decisions, and mitigations. For cybersecurity, this would include threat models, mitigation strategies, and postmarket surveillance plans.
Indirectly, yes. ISO 14971 emphasizes continuous risk evaluation. For cybersecurity, this means ongoing monitoring of new threats, updating risk assessments, and managing patches or software updates as part of lifecycle risk control.
Both ISO 14971 and the FDA’s guidance stress proactive, risk-based approaches. Incorporating ISO 14971 into your cybersecurity program aligns well with FDA expectations for secure design, documentation, and vulnerability response.
Relevant companion standards include:
AAMI TIR57 – Cybersecurity risk management in medical devices
IEC 81001-5-1 – Secure software development
ISO/IEC 27001 – Information security management systems
These provide technical depth where ISO 14971 provides the overall risk management framework.
Blue Goat Cyber helps manufacturers:
Perform cyber-specific risk assessments
Build FDA and ISO 14971-compliant risk files
Conduct penetration testing and threat modeling
Align cybersecurity controls with safety and performance objectives
We streamline compliance while enhancing device security and patient safety.
Yes — while it began as a safety-focused standard, it applies equally to cybersecurity threats that could impact a device’s safety and effectiveness.
The FDA expects cybersecurity to be integrated into the overall risk management process. ISO 14971 provides a recognized framework for doing so.
Absolutely. Postmarket monitoring is critical for identifying new vulnerabilities and updating risk controls accordingly.