BLE & RF Pen Testing for Connected Devices.
Targeted wireless interface testing for BLE, Wi-Fi, NFC, and proprietary RF protocols - the attack surface generic pen testers can't reach. Reviewer-ready evidence for FDA premarket and EU MDR submissions.
The short answer
What is BLE and RF penetration testing for medical devices?
BLE and RF penetration testing checks a device's wireless interfaces, such as Bluetooth Low Energy, Wi-Fi, Zigbee, NFC and proprietary radio, for weaknesses an attacker in range could use. Typical checks include pairing and bonding, authentication of commands, encryption, replay attacks and fuzzing of the radio protocol. Findings are rated for patient-harm risk and traced to your threat model for the FDA report.
100+ wireless interfaces tested. Zero FDA rejections.
- BLE & GATT
- Wi-Fi & EAP
- Proprietary RF / SDR
- NFC & RFID
- Free 30-min scoping call
- Fixed-fee quote in 24 hours
- Senior wireless tester, not a generalist
- SDR + protocol fuzzing in-house
- Re-test included
Why Generic Pen Testers Skip the Wireless Interface
Most penetration testing firms run nmap, nessus, and a Burp scan. None of those touch the actual radio. FDA's Feb 2026 guidance expects every interface to be exercised - and the wireless interface is where patient data leaves the device.
No SDR or RF Tooling
Without HackRF, Ubertooth, or a logic analyzer on hand, the tester literally cannot observe the protocol they're supposed to attack.
BLE GATT Treated as a Black Box
Generic firms enumerate services then stop. Real testing exercises every characteristic permission, pairing mode, and bonding edge case.
No Threat-Model Linkage
Findings arrive as a CSV of protocol oddities with no mapping to your AAMI TIR57 risk file - so reviewers can't trace the controls.
What We Actually Test
Scope is à la carte - pick the radios in your device. We bring the lab, the SDRs, and the protocol expertise.
Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)
- Pairing mode review (Just Works, Passkey, OOB, Numeric Comparison)
- Bonding key storage and re-pairing abuse
- GATT service and characteristic permission audit
- MITM via active relay (Btlejack, GATTacker)
- Connection parameter abuse and DoS
- Privacy / address randomization validation
Wi-Fi & 802.11
- WPA2/WPA3 handshake capture and offline analysis
- EAP method enumeration (PEAP, TLS, TTLS) and rogue AP
- Association flooding, deauth, and Evil Twin scenarios
- Captive portal and provisioning flow review
- Hidden SSID and management frame abuse
Proprietary & Sub-GHz RF
- SDR capture (HackRF / LimeSDR / RTL-SDR) and demodulation
- Protocol reverse engineering from physical layer up
- Replay, jamming, and selective-jam scenarios
- Cryptographic primitive review (rolling code, AES-CCM)
- Fuzzing of identified protocol fields
NFC, RFID & Cellular
- NFC tag clone, replay, and relay (Proxmark3)
- ISO 14443 / 15693 protocol abuse
- Cellular modem AT-command surface review
- SIM / eSIM provisioning flow inspection
Engagement Methodology
Four phases. Two to four weeks. Reviewer-ready evidence at the end.
- 01
Scoping & Threat Model Intake
We review your AAMI TIR57 threat model, architecture diagrams, and intended-use radios. We agree on test environment (lab device vs. on-site), credentials, and out-of-scope frequencies.
- 02
Lab Setup & Baseline Capture
We build a controlled RF environment using shielded enclosures where required, baseline normal protocol behavior, and confirm coverage of every radio in scope.
- 03
Active Testing & Exploitation
Manual protocol attacks across pairing, association, and data flows. SDR-based fuzzing of proprietary layers. Each finding reproduced with packet captures saved as evidence.
- 04
FDA-Ready Reporting & Re-test
Findings mapped to your threat model, risk file, and the Feb 2026 FDA guidance. Re-test of remediated findings included until you pass.
Reviewer-ready deliverables in one engagement
Every ble & rf penetration testing engagement ships with the artifacts FDA reviewers expect to see - traceable, complete, and aligned with current guidance.
- BLE pairing, bonding, and GATT attribute testing
- Wi-Fi association, EAP, and rogue-AP scenarios
- Proprietary RF protocol fuzzing (sub-GHz, 2.4 GHz)
- NFC/RFID replay, relay, and clone attempts
- SDR-based capture, demod, and replay
- Findings mapped to threat model + AAMI TIR57 risk file
Pricing Guidance
Fixed-fee. We quote within 24 hours of a scoping call. Ranges below assume a single device under test in our lab.
Single Radio
$12k - $22k
BLE-only wearable, single-protocol device, or a tightly-scoped retest of a previously assessed radio.
- 1 radio interface in depth
- Threat-model-aligned report
- One round of re-test
- AAMI TIR57 + FDA mapping
Multi-Radio
$22k - $45k
Most connected devices: BLE + Wi-Fi, or BLE + proprietary RF, with a moderate GATT surface and OTA path.
- 2-3 radio interfaces
- GATT permission + pairing-mode matrix
- SDR capture and protocol RE
- Two rounds of re-test
Complex / Proprietary
$45k - $90k+
Devices with proprietary sub-GHz protocols, mesh networks, or multiple paired peripherals (e.g., surgical platforms, infusion ecosystems).
- Full protocol reverse engineering
- Custom fuzzer development
- Mesh / multi-peripheral scenarios
- Dedicated senior wireless lead
What drives the price
- Number of distinct radios in scope (BLE, Wi-Fi, RF, NFC, cellular)
- Whether the protocol is standards-based or proprietary
- Test environment (our lab, your lab, on-site at hospital)
- Need for shielded enclosure / FCC-controlled test conditions
- Depth of GATT surface (number of services and characteristics)
- Inclusion of OTA update path testing
Ranges are guidance only. Actual quotes are fixed-fee after a 30-minute scoping call.
BLE & RF Pen Testing FAQs
BLE & RF Penetration Testing - scoped, fixed-fee, FDA-ready.
Targeted wireless interface testing for BLE, Wi-Fi, NFC, and proprietary RF protocols - the attack surface generic pen testers can't reach. Reviewer-ready evidence for FDA premarket and EU MDR submissions.
