Blue Goat CyberBlue Goat CyberSMMedical Device Cybersecurity
    Start here
    Services
    • Medical Device Cybersecurity Consulting
    • FDA Premarket Cybersecurity Package
    • Medical Device Penetration Testing Services
    • FDA Deficiency Response
    • FDA Postmarket Cybersecurity
    • Medical Device Threat Modeling
    • eSTAR Cybersecurity Documentation Support
    See all services
    Products

    Blue Goat products

    • GoatWatch logoGoatWatchSBOM risk management for medical devices
    About
    Resources

    Learn

    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • Webinars
    • Talks & workshops
    • Glossary
    • FAQs

    Playbooks & Tools

    • Guides
    • Playbooks (PDF)
    • Infographics
    • Interactive Tools

    Signals & Proof

    • Goat FeedNew
    • News
    • Medical Device Security News
    • The Goat's Weekly
    • Case Studies
    • Proof / Receipts
    All resources, topic hubs, & collections →
    ⌘K
    Book Strategy SessionHow to prepare →
    Blue Goat Cyber

    Full-service medical device cybersecurity. We protect patients by securing connected medical devices from design through postmarket.

    275+ FDA submissions supported, zero cybersecurity rejections · Mission: 1,000 by 2028

    SDVOSB · Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business

    We sponsor 10 community projects →

    Services

    • FDA Premarket Cybersecurity Package
    • FDA Deficiency Response
    • Medical Device Threat Modeling
    • Medical Device Penetration Testing Services
    • FDA Postmarket Cybersecurity
    • All services →
    Services
    • FDA Premarket Cybersecurity Package
    • FDA Deficiency Response
    • Medical Device Threat Modeling
    • Medical Device Penetration Testing Services
    • FDA Postmarket Cybersecurity
    • All services →

    Company

    • About
    • Core values
    • Manifesto
    • Leadership
    • Why Us
    • Partners
    • Careers
    • Press
    • Press kit
    • Contact
    • Company overviewPDF
    Company
    • About
    • Core values
    • Manifesto
    • Leadership
    • Why Us
    • Partners
    • Careers
    • Press
    • Press kit
    • Contact
    • Company overviewPDF

    Resources

    • Blog
    • Guides
    • Podcast
    • Case studies
    • Monthly Pulse newsletter
    • All resources →
    Resources
    • Blog
    • Guides
    • Podcast
    • Case studies
    • Monthly Pulse newsletter
    • All resources →

    Get in touch

    • info@bluegoatcyber.com
    • 844-939-GOAT
    • Book a strategy session →
    • 1776 N Scottsdale Rd, Unit 727
      Scottsdale, AZ 85257Serving clients worldwide

    Follow

    © 2026 Blue Goat Cyber. All rights reserved.

    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Cookies
    • Sitemap
    • Accessibility
    • CVD

    MedTech Cybersecurity · Since 2022

    3-minute classifier

    SaMD or SiMD? And what does EU MDR Rule 11 say?

    Four questions to determine your software's classification under IMDRF and EU MDR Rule 11 - plus the cybersecurity evidence each path requires.

    Christian Espinosa, Founder & CEO, Blue Goat Cyber

    Reviewed by

    Christian Espinosa

    Founder & CEO, Blue Goat Cyber

    Last reviewed November 2, 2026

    Is the software embedded in a hardware medical device (firmware, integral controller)?

    What does the software primarily do? (IMDRF significance to medical decision)

    Severity of the healthcare situation or condition

    Is any part of the software hosted in the cloud or accessible over a network?

    What you'll see after you submit

    Your four answers become a class meter and an evidence checklist

    • ClassMeter infographic: Class I → IIa → IIb → III bar with your Rule 11 placement highlighted.
    • SaMD vs SiMD reasoning card, written so a Notified Body reviewer would accept it as the rationale paragraph.
    • Cybersecurity evidence list (SBOM, threat model, pen test, IEC 82304-1 / 62304, MDCG 2019-16) auto-tailored to your answers.
    • Printable one-pager you can attach to your design-input rationale and risk file.

    Common misconceptions

    What teams usually get wrong

    • Myth: If our software is mobile-only, it must be SaMD.

      Reality: Form factor doesn't decide it. A mobile app that's the user interface for a hardware device's firmware can still be SiMD - what matters is whether the software is integral to a regulated hardware device.

    • Myth: Rule 11 only escalates closed-loop control software.

      Reality: Rule 11 also pushes 'inform → diagnose / monitor' upward whenever the healthcare situation is serious or critical. Most clinical decision support lands in IIa or IIb, not Class I.

    • Myth: Class I SaMD means no Notified Body involvement.

      Reality: Only Class I non-sterile, non-measuring, non-reusable surgical software self-certifies. The moment Rule 11 pushes you to IIa or higher, a Notified Body is required for the CE mark.

    • Myth: Cloud hosting doesn't change the classification.

      Reality: Classification stays the same, but cloud-hosted SaMD triggers extra MDCG 2019-16 evidence (operating-environment specification, shared-responsibility matrix, cloud pen test) that local-only SaMD avoids.

    References & further reading

    Primary sources behind this tool

    1. 1MDR 2017/745 Annex VIII - Classification Rules (Rule 11) - European Commission
    2. 2MDCG 2019-11 - Qualification and Classification of Software - MDCG
    3. 3MDCG 2019-16 Rev.1 - Guidance on Cybersecurity for Medical Devices - MDCG
    4. 4IEC 82304-1:2016 / IEC 62304:2006+A1:2015 - Health software product safety & lifecycle - IEC
    5. 5IMDRF/SaMD WG/N12 - Possible Framework for Risk Categorization - IMDRF
    Why this tool is current

    Recent regulatory + supply-chain activity

    Tracked signals that change what reviewers expect. Items move on as new ones land.

    • Dec 4, 2024FDA

      FDA finalizes PCCP guidance for AI/ML-enabled device software functions

    • Apr 15, 2024SPDX

      SPDX 3.0 final published - adds AI & dataset profiles relevant to AI/ML SaMD

    Read deeper

    Pair this with the long-form guidance.

    SaMD cybersecurity requirements

    FDA Section 524B, IEC 82304-1, EU MDR Rule 11 in one guide.

    Read SaMD cybersecurity requirements

    SaMD vs SiMD cybersecurity

    Side-by-side comparison of cyber obligations for each path.

    Read SaMD vs SiMD cybersecurity

    FDA premarket cybersecurity services

    Submission-ready cyber evidence for FDA pathways (510(k), De Novo, PMA).

    Read FDA premarket cybersecurity services

    More tools

    PCCP, §524B checker, SBOM readiness.

    Read More tools