Blue Goat CyberBlue Goat CyberSMMedical Device Cybersecurity
    Start here
    Services
    • Medical Device Cybersecurity Consulting
    • FDA Premarket Cybersecurity Package
    • Medical Device Penetration Testing Services
    • FDA Deficiency Response
    • FDA Postmarket Cybersecurity
    • Medical Device Threat Modeling
    • eSTAR Cybersecurity Documentation Support
    See all services
    Products

    Blue Goat products

    • GoatWatch logoGoatWatchSBOM risk management for medical devices
    About
    Resources

    Learn

    • Blog
    • Podcast
    • Webinars
    • Talks & workshops
    • Glossary
    • FAQs

    Playbooks & Tools

    • Guides
    • Playbooks (PDF)
    • Infographics
    • Interactive Tools

    Signals & Proof

    • Goat FeedNew
    • News
    • Medical Device Security News
    • The Goat's Weekly
    • Case Studies
    • Proof / Receipts
    All resources, topic hubs, & collections →
    ⌘K
    Book Strategy SessionHow to prepare →
    Blue Goat Cyber

    Full-service medical device cybersecurity. We protect patients by securing connected medical devices from design through postmarket.

    275+ FDA submissions supported, zero cybersecurity rejections · Mission: 1,000 by 2028

    SDVOSB · Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business

    We sponsor 10 community projects →

    Services

    • FDA Premarket Cybersecurity Package
    • FDA Deficiency Response
    • Medical Device Threat Modeling
    • Medical Device Penetration Testing Services
    • FDA Postmarket Cybersecurity
    • All services →
    Services
    • FDA Premarket Cybersecurity Package
    • FDA Deficiency Response
    • Medical Device Threat Modeling
    • Medical Device Penetration Testing Services
    • FDA Postmarket Cybersecurity
    • All services →

    Company

    • About
    • Core values
    • Manifesto
    • Leadership
    • Why Us
    • Partners
    • Careers
    • Press
    • Press kit
    • Contact
    • Company overviewPDF
    Company
    • About
    • Core values
    • Manifesto
    • Leadership
    • Why Us
    • Partners
    • Careers
    • Press
    • Press kit
    • Contact
    • Company overviewPDF

    Resources

    • Blog
    • Guides
    • Podcast
    • Case studies
    • Monthly Pulse newsletter
    • All resources →
    Resources
    • Blog
    • Guides
    • Podcast
    • Case studies
    • Monthly Pulse newsletter
    • All resources →

    Get in touch

    • info@bluegoatcyber.com
    • 844-939-GOAT
    • Book a strategy session →
    • 1776 N Scottsdale Rd, Unit 727
      Scottsdale, AZ 85257Serving clients worldwide

    Follow

    © 2026 Blue Goat Cyber. All rights reserved.

    • Privacy
    • Terms
    • Cookies
    • Sitemap
    • Accessibility
    • CVD

    MedTech Cybersecurity · Since 2022

    Goat Feed · Methodology

    The Blue Goat Risk Score

    A MedTech-specific 0-10 rubric that combines CVSS 4.0 technical impact, patient-safety potential, exploit maturity, and device exposure. Published in the open so security teams, regulators, and reviewers can replicate every score.

    Why a MedTech score

    A CVSS score alone is not a useful triage signal for a medical-device team. A CVSS 9.8 on a back-office library and a CVSS 7.2 on an infusion pump are not equivalent risks, but a generic scoring system treats them that way.

    Blue Goat Risk Score is our attempt to publish a defensible MedTech score in the open. Every number on the Goat Feed is computed by the formula below, against data we display on the same page, so reviewers and customers can replicate or challenge any classification.

    The formula

    Blue Goat Risk Score = (CVSS × 0.40) + (Patient-safety × 0.35) + (Exploit-maturity × 0.15) + (MedTech-exposure × 0.10). All four components score 0-10 independently; the final score is rounded to one decimal.

    CVSS technical
    40%

    CVSS 4.0 base score when published, falling back to CVSS 3.1 then 3.0. This is Blue Goat Cyber's preference; the FDA guidance does not require a particular CVSS version. Missing CVSS scores get a neutral 4/10 so that an item without an NVD entry is never inadvertently rated 0.

    Patient safety
    35%

    Inferred from device-class signals in the headline, dek, tags, and vendor record. Tiers: life-threatening (implantables, ventilators, infusion pumps, pacemakers, anesthesia, ECMO), injury (imaging, robotic surgery, dialysis, radiotherapy, CGM/glucose), delay-of-care (EHR/EMR, HL7/FHIR, PACS, pharmacy/medication workflow), or none.

    Exploit maturity
    15%

    KEV-listed > weaponized > public PoC > none. KEV items receive the full 10 - inclusion in CISA's KEV catalog is direct evidence of in-the-wild exploitation with a federal remediation deadline.

    MedTech exposure
    10%

    Baseline of 4 (item is in the MedTech feed at all), +3 for network-reachable signals (remote, network, cloud, Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, TLS, SSH, VPN), +2 when a device class is identified, +1 when a vendor slug is resolved.

    Tiers

    The numeric score maps to a triage tier displayed alongside the headline on every feed item.

    • Critical8.5 - 10Same-day triage. Confirmed exploitation or life-threatening clinical potential.
    • High7.0 - 8.4Patch within current sprint. Strong technical impact or clinical-injury potential.
    • Notable4.0 - 6.9Fold into next compliance cycle. Defensible to defer with documented rationale.
    • Info0 - 3.9Background. Track for trend analysis.

    Worked examples

    KEV - Implantable cardiac monitor with critical CVSS

    • CVSS 4.0 = 9.4
    • Patient safety = life-threatening (cardiac monitor)
    • Exploit = KEV
    • Exposure = 9/10 (network-reachable, vendor known)

    9.4 × 0.40 + 10 × 0.35 + 10 × 0.15 + 9 × 0.10 = 3.76 + 3.50 + 1.50 + 0.90 = 9.7

    9.7 - Critical

    NVD CVE - HL7 integration library, no PoC

    • CVSS 3.1 = 7.5
    • Patient safety = delay-of-care (HL7/FHIR)
    • Exploit = none
    • Exposure = 7/10 (network signals)

    7.5 × 0.40 + 5 × 0.35 + 2 × 0.15 + 7 × 0.10 = 3.00 + 1.75 + 0.30 + 0.70 = 5.8

    5.8 - Notable

    Linux kernel CVE on a backend server (KEV-listed)

    • CVSS 3.1 = 7.8
    • Patient safety = none (kernel infra, no device-class match)
    • Exploit = KEV
    • Exposure = 7/10

    7.8 × 0.40 + 2 × 0.35 + 10 × 0.15 + 7 × 0.10 = 3.12 + 0.70 + 1.50 + 0.70 = 6.0

    6.0 - Notable

    Scope and limits

    • Blue Goat Risk Score is computed for KEV and CVE items only. FDA letters, recalls, and MAUDE events keep their existing severity (critical/notable/info) classification.
    • Patient-safety tier is inferred from device-class signals in the source text. We will add an admin override and per-vendor product-line maps in a future revision.
    • CVSS 4.0 is Blue Goat Cyber's preference when published; the FDA guidance does not require a particular CVSS version. NVD coverage of 4.0 is still uneven, so most current items fall back to CVSS 3.1.
    • The score is a triage aid, not a substitute for your own SBOM-driven impact analysis or a Section 524B postmarket vulnerability review.

    Changelog

    • v1.0 - Initial publication. Four-component rubric, KEV/CVE only, auto-inferred patient safety.

    See the full Goat Feed methodology for source lists, ingestion cadence, and editorial controls. For what FDA reviewers actually flag in cybersecurity submissions, read our Top FDA Cybersecurity Deficiencies report.

    Need help triaging your SBOM?

    Blue Goat Cyber runs postmarket vulnerability management for medical-device teams.

    30-minute strategy session. No cost, no commitment - just answers from people who've supported 275+ FDA submissions, with zero cybersecurity rejections.

    Talk to usGoatWatch overview