Legacy / End-of-Support Component Triage
For devices stuck on Windows 10 IoT, RHEL 7, end-of-life kernels, or unsupported chipsets. Score the residual risk, capture the compensating controls, and export a memo a reviewer will accept.
Reviewed by
Christian Espinosa
Founder & CEO, Blue Goat Cyber
Risk factors present
Compensating controls in place
What you'll see after you submit
Risk factors + controls → reviewer-ready compensating-controls memo
- Frames the legacy component the way the FDA's TPLC guidance asks you to: risk, control, residual, exit plan.
- Each compensating control comes with a clear submission-evidence line so you know exactly what to attach.
- Markdown export drops straight into the cybersecurity risk-management report.
Common misconceptions
What teams usually get wrong
-
Myth: EOS components are an automatic submission blocker.
Reality: They aren't - but only if you document the residual risk and the compensating controls in a way the reviewer can verify. Hand-waving gets a deficiency letter.
-
Myth: A vendor LTS contract is enough on its own.
Reality: It's a strong control, but reviewers also want to see segmentation, monitoring, and an exit plan with a date.
References & further reading
Primary sources behind this tool
Recent regulatory + supply-chain activity
Tracked signals that change what reviewers expect. Items move on as new ones land.
-
Jun 30, 2026EOS clock
RHEL 7 Extended Life Support phase ends - devices on RHEL 7 need a compensating-controls memo
-
Apr 22, 2026CISA KEV
CISA adds use-after-free in Linux kernel netfilter to KEV (CVE-2026-0511)
-
Feb 14, 2026Blue Goat research
AI-letter analysis - 62% of FDA cyber deficiencies cite a missing or stale CVD URL
-
Nov 12, 2025OpenSSF
SLSA v1.1 published - tightened build-provenance language for regulated industries