Comparison guide

    ISO 14971 vs AAMI SW96

    They are not competing standards. SW96 is the cybersecurity overlay on ISO 14971's safety risk-management framework.

    The details

    Side-by-side breakdown

    DimensionISO 14971ANSI/AAMI SW96
    ScopeSafety risk management for medical devices.Cybersecurity risk management for medical devices.
    Current editionISO 14971:2019; distinguish the European EN adoption and its amendment.ANSI/AAMI SW96:2023.
    StatusMedical device safety risk-management framework; assess applicable regulatory use.FDA-recognized consensus standard for cybersecurity risk.
    Risk inputsHazards, hazardous situations, harm.Threats, vulnerabilities, exploitability, patient impact.
    Risk fileOne safety risk file (RMF).Parallel security risk file linked to the safety RMF.
    AcceptabilityRisk acceptability defined by manufacturer's policy.Manufacturer-defined acceptance criteria; assess exploitability and security impact, with separate patient-harm analysis where applicable.
    Used togetherConnect relevant cybersecurity findings to safety risk records when a credible patient-harm pathway exists.Designed as an overlay; SW96 explicitly references 14971.
    Guidance

    When to use which

    Document connections between cybersecurity findings and safety risk records where a credible patient-harm pathway exists. The manufacturer supplies harm severity and owns acceptance criteria and risk decisions.

    Preserve relevant TIR57 history and assess gaps against the standards and guidance used in your current process. A crosswalk records evidence connections; it does not establish automatic equivalence or acceptance.

    FAQ

    Frequently asked questions

    Related

    Keep exploring

    Ready when you are

    Secure your device before it reaches patients.

    30-minute strategy session. No cost, no commitment - just answers from people who've supported 275+ FDA submissions, with zero cybersecurity rejections.