Goat Feed · CVE

    NVD CVE-2026-122044 (CVSS 3.0 8.8 HIGH) - Philips

    Philips Hue Bridge Pro Protection Mechanism Failure Authentication Bypass Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Philips Hue Bridge Pro. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability

    Back to the daily feed
    CVE
    notable

    Blue Goat Risk Score

    Blue Goat Cyber MedTech rubric v1.0 · methodology

    8.1
    of 10
    high
    CVSS technical
    40% · +3.5

    3.0 base 8.8 · CVSS:3.0/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

    Patient safety
    35% · +3.5

    Life-threatening

    Exploit maturity
    15% · +0.3

    No public exploit observed

    MedTech exposure
    10% · +0.8

    8/10 network-reachable signals

    How we got to 8.1

    1. 1
      CVSS technical severity (40%)

      Industry-standard exploitability + impact score. We prefer CVSS 4.0 and fall back to 3.1 per the FDA's Feb 2026 premarket cybersecurity guidance. Missing CVSS scores get a neutral 4.0 so unknown vulns are not over- or under-rated.

      3.0 base 8.8 × 40% = +3.52
    2. 2
      Patient safety impact (35%)

      What happens to a patient if this vuln is exploited on a connected device. Auto-inferred from headline, dek, tags, and device class against a curated MedTech keyword library (pacemaker, infusion pump, EHR, PACS, etc.).

      Life-threatening → 10 × 35% = +3.50
    3. 3
      Exploit maturity (15%)

      Is anyone actually using this in attacks? KEV listing > weaponized exploit > public PoC > none. KEV alone forces tier=critical regardless of CVSS.

      No public exploit observed → 2 × 15% = +0.30
    4. 4
      MedTech exposure (10%)

      How likely this affects clinical operations: presence in our MedTech feed (+4 baseline), network-reachable signals (+3), known device-class tags (+2), identified MedTech vendor (+1).

      Exposure 8/10 × 10% = +0.80

    Tier cutoffs: Critical ≥ 8.5 · High 7.0–8.4 · Notable 4.0–6.9 · Info < 4.0. Full methodology, weights, and changelog at /goatfeed/risk-rubric.

    Other items reviewed by the Blue Goat team.

    Need help acting on this?

    Talk to Blue Goat Cyber

    Penetration testing, SBOM, threat modeling, and 524B submission support for MedTech.